Indicator 86
National Research Council's Ratings of UC Doctoral Programs, 1995
Total Number of Programs Rated | Number of Programs Ranked in Top 10 on Faculty Quality | Percent of Programs Ranked in Top 10 on Faculty Quality | |
---|---|---|---|
Berkeley | 37 | 36 | 0.97 |
Davis | 26 | 1 | 0.04 |
Irvine | 24 | 2 | 0.08 |
Los Angeles | 36 | 13 | 0.36 |
Riverside | 19 | - | 0 |
San Diego | 29 | 14 | 0.48 |
San Francisco | 9 | 6 | 0.67 |
Santa Barbara | 32 | 4 | 0.13 |
Santa Cruz | 17 | 2 | 0.12 |
Total UC | 229 | 78 | 0.34 |
U of Illinois | 37 | 10 | 0.27 |
U of Michigan | 41 | 14 | 0.34 |
SUNY at Buffalo | 35 | 0 | |
U of Virginia | 32 | 5 | 0.16 |
Harvard | 30 | 26 | 0.87 |
MIT | 23 | 20 | 0.87 |
Stanford | 43 | 32 | 0.74 |
Yale | 30 | 19 | 0.63 |
Considered the gold standard of academic quality rankings, the National Research Council's assessments of research-doctorate programs are the most comprehensive and respected evaluations of Ph.D. programs in the United States.
Although dated, the 1995 rankings are the most recent NRC rankings as of May 2010. The NRC plans to release an updated set of rankings using a revised methodology later in 2010.
In 1995, the NRC assessed doctoral programs in 41 fields of study at 274 universities. Overall, a third of all of UC's programs that were ranked in 1995 were in the top 10 percent nationally in terms of faculty quality.
Source: National Research Council. Additional information can be found at: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/pga/Resdoc/.
You may view or download a table of the raw data used to generate these charts in CSV files, which can be opened in spreadsheet programs such as Microsoft Excel or OpenOffice.